Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 14, 2025

Golden Loop, LLC v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:25-cv-02469
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Golden Loop v. Live Nation, Judge Liman held that diversity jurisdiction existed after correcting the complaint’s headquarters allegation.

Who this affects

Golden Loop, LLC and Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.; the ruling establishes that the federal court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the action.

What happened

Golden Loop, LLC sued Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., relying only on diversity jurisdiction. The court questioned jurisdiction because Golden Loop’s sole member was a New York citizen and the complaint said Live Nation’s headquarters were in New York.

Golden Loop then told the court that it had identified Live Nation’s headquarters incorrectly. It stated that Live Nation’s principal office and corporate headquarters were in California and submitted a 2024 Live Nation report supporting that statement.

The court concluded that the parties had diverse citizenship, treated the complaint as corrected to state that basis for jurisdiction, and found that it had subject-matter jurisdiction. Judge Liman did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Golden Loop, LLC v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. · No. 1:25-cv-02469
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Aug. 14, 2025

Background

Golden Loop, LLC brought the action against Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. The complaint identified diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as the only basis for federal jurisdiction. Because a limited liability company has the citizenship of all its members for diversity purposes, the court required Golden Loop to identify its members. Golden Loop stated that its sole member, Gary Brifil, was a New York citizen.

The complaint also alleged that Live Nation was incorporated in California and had its headquarters in New York. Because the complaint therefore appeared to identify both sides as New York citizens, the court ordered the parties to explain why the case should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

Corrected Jurisdictional Information

In response, Golden Loop stated that it had alleged Live Nation’s New York headquarters in error. It said Live Nation’s principal office and corporate headquarters were in California and submitted a 2024 Live Nation report stating the same.

Ruling

The court concluded that the declaration and attached report established the required diversity of citizenship and that the court had subject-matter jurisdiction. It held that a complaint may be treated as amended when the record, including later-supplied information, establishes that the required diversity existed all along. The court therefore deemed Golden Loop’s complaint amended to properly allege diversity jurisdiction. Judge Lewis J. Liman did not decide the merits of the parties’ underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.