Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 12, 2025

Collado v. Grivalda

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-06509
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Collado v. Grivalda, Judge Swain transferred the constitutional-rights case from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York.

Who this affects

The case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. Collado’s claims were not decided on the merits; the receiving court must decide whether he may proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

In Collado v. Grivalda, Ivan Collado, representing himself while detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, sued three defendants over alleged excessive force and denial of medical care.

The court said the alleged events occurred in Brooklyn, which is in the Eastern District of New York, and that the documents and witnesses would likely be there. It therefore found that the Eastern District was a more convenient place for the case.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the case transferred to the Eastern District of New York. She also directed that no summons issue from the Southern District, left any decision about proceeding without prepaying fees to the receiving court, and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Collado v. Grivalda · No. 1:25-cv-06509
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 12, 2025

Background

Ivan Collado, who is detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn because of pending criminal proceedings, brought this case without a lawyer. He asserted claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Captain Grivalda, Chibarg, and psychiatrist Bronco violated his constitutional rights by using excessive force and denying him medical care at the detention center.

Venue Analysis

The court considered the federal venue statute, which identifies locations where a civil case may be filed. It said it was unclear whether venue was proper in the Southern District of New York based on the defendants’ residences because Collado listed addresses at the Brooklyn detention center and their residences were unknown.

The court concluded that venue did not appear proper in the Southern District based on where the events occurred. The alleged events took place at the Brooklyn detention center, and Brooklyn is in Kings County, within the Eastern District of New York. The court also considered transfer for convenience and the interests of justice. It found that the underlying events occurred in Brooklyn and reasonably expected that the relevant documents and witnesses would also be there.

Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The order closed the case in the Southern District of New York, directed that no summons issue from that court, and stated that the receiving court would decide whether Collado could proceed without prepaying fees. The court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The order did not decide the merits of Collado’s constitutional claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.