Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 15, 2025

Squarex Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Spartan Capital Securities LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:24-cv-06880
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Squarex Pharmaceutical v. Spartan Capital, Judge Vyskocil allowed jurisdictional discovery into the LLC’s membership before deciding jurisdiction.

Who this affects

Squarex Pharmaceutical Corporation may conduct limited discovery from Spartan Capital Securities LLC about the citizenship of Spartan’s members. The order also requires Squarex to report to the court by September 2, 2025.

What happened

Squarex Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Spartan Capital Securities LLC concerns whether the federal court has authority to hear Squarex’s case based on the parties’ citizenship and the amount at stake. Squarex also moved for default judgment, but this order addressed jurisdictional information.

Squarex’s complaint stated that it was incorporated in Delaware and had a corporate home in Minnesota. It did not state the citizenship of Spartan Capital Securities, a limited liability company whose citizenship depends on the citizenship of its members. Squarex told the court that public records showed Spartan Capital Securities was at least 75% owned by Spartan Capital Holdings, LLC, which it said was wholly owned and operated by John D. Lowry, a New York citizen.

Judge Vyskocil ruled that Squarex had made a sufficient start toward showing that federal jurisdiction may exist. The court allowed Squarex to obtain discovery from Spartan Capital Securities about the citizenship of its members and ordered Squarex to report the results by September 2, 2025; the order did not decide whether jurisdiction exists.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Squarex Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Spartan Capital Securities LLC · No. 1:24-cv-06880
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Aug. 15, 2025

Background

Squarex Pharmaceutical Corporation, formerly known as Squarex LLC, filed this case against Spartan Capital Securities LLC. Squarex’s complaint alleged that the court had diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Diversity jurisdiction is federal-court authority based generally on the parties being citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeding $75,000.

The complaint stated that Squarex was incorporated in Delaware and had a “corporate home” in Minnesota. It did not identify the citizenship of Spartan Capital Securities’ members. Because a limited liability company’s citizenship depends on the citizenship of all of its members, the court ordered Squarex to explain why the case should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

Squarex responded that a search of public records showed Spartan Capital Securities was “75% or more” owned by Spartan Capital Holdings, LLC. Squarex further stated that Spartan Capital Holdings was wholly and solely owned and operated by John D. Lowry, whom Squarex identified as a New York citizen. Squarex asked the court either to find that subject-matter jurisdiction existed or to allow discovery concerning jurisdiction.

Court’s Analysis

The court explained that it may allow jurisdictional discovery—discovery limited to facts needed to determine whether the court has jurisdiction—when a plaintiff makes a threshold showing of a possible basis for jurisdiction. The court considered the facts in the light most favorable to Squarex for purposes of the motion and found that Squarex had made a sufficient start toward establishing that jurisdiction might exist.

The court stated that if discovery showed that all members of Spartan Capital Securities were citizens of states different from Squarex, diversity jurisdiction would exist. The court also emphasized that the permitted discovery had to be relevant and proportional to the needs of the case.

Order

The court ordered that Squarex may take discovery from Spartan Capital Securities concerning the citizenship of its members. Squarex must update the court by September 2, 2025, about the results of the discovery and state whether it intends to amend the operative complaint. The order did not determine whether the court ultimately has subject-matter jurisdiction, and it did not rule on the motion for default judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.