Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 14, 2025

CFSP 2024-AHP1 81-83 Seaman Avenue LLC v. 81 Seaman Realty LLC

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:25-cv-04113
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In CFSP 2024-AHP1 81-83 Seaman Avenue LLC v. 81 Seaman Realty LLC, Judge Abrams ordered supplemental briefing about the trust’s structure.

Who this affects

81 Seaman Realty LLC was ordered to provide supplemental briefing, and CFSP 2024-AHP1 81-83 Seaman Avenue LLC was permitted to respond. The opinion also names Joel Wiener, the New York City Environmental Control Board, and unnamed defendants, but does not impose a briefing requirement on them.

What happened

In CFSP 2024-AHP1 81-83 Seaman Avenue LLC v. 81 Seaman Realty LLC, Defendant 81 Seaman Realty LLC argued during oral argument that the underlying trust was a non-traditional business trust because a “directing certificateholder” exercised some control over the trust’s affairs.

The court noted at least three Southern District of New York decisions rejecting similar arguments and treating trusts as traditional trusts despite having a directing certificateholder. The opinion did not decide which view applied here.

Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered 81 Seaman Realty LLC to file a supplemental letter by August 18, 2025, addressing those decisions and other similar rulings. The plaintiff could respond by August 20, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
CFSP 2024-AHP1 81-83 Seaman Avenue LLC v. 81 Seaman Realty LLC · No. 1:25-cv-04113
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Aug. 14, 2025

Nature of the order

This was a procedural order directing supplemental briefing after oral argument. The court did not resolve the parties’ underlying dispute or decide whether the trust was a traditional or non-traditional business trust.

Issue discussed

Defendant 81 Seaman Realty LLC asserted that the underlying trust was a non-traditional business trust under Americold because it had a “directing certificateholder” with some control over trust affairs.

The court identified three decisions from the Southern District of New York that rejected similar arguments and held that a trust remained a traditional trust even when it had a directing certificateholder: Wilmington Tr., N.A. v. 115 Owner LLC, No. 20-cv-2157 (JMF); Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. 390 Park Eve. Assocs., LLC, No. 16-cv-9112 (LGS); and Wilmington Tr., N.A. v. Aevri Salina Meadows LLC, No. 23-cv-8824 (JPC). The opinion did not state the court’s ultimate conclusion on the trust’s status.

Court’s action

Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered 81 Seaman Realty LLC to file a supplemental letter by August 18, 2025, addressing the cited decisions and any other similar rulings bearing on its directing-certificateholder argument. The plaintiff was permitted to respond by August 20, 2025. The order was signed and dated August 14, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.