Tserpelis v. BDO USA PC
- Willis
- 1:25-cv-05613
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Tserpelis v. BDO USA PC, Judge Willis granted leave to file an unredacted amended complaint under seal to protect confidential business information.
Eleni Tserpelis, also known as Eleni Lagos, and BDO USA PC; the ruling also protects confidential information concerning BDO’s clients and business operations from public disclosure in the amended complaint.
What happened
In Tserpelis v. BDO USA PC, Eleni Tserpelis, also known as Eleni Lagos, asked to file an unredacted amended complaint under seal while keeping a redacted version publicly available.
The request said the unredacted filing contained confidential information about BDO USA PC’s clients and business, including client names, revenue and budgeting figures, client accounts, partnership details, personnel matters, and business strategies. It argued that these interests outweighed the public’s general right to see court filings.
The court granted the request. Judge Willis’s order therefore allowed the unredacted amended complaint to be filed under seal while the redacted version remained available to the public.
The detailed version
- Tserpelis v. BDO USA PC · No. 1:25-cv-05613
- Willis
- Aug. 18, 2025
Background
Eleni Tserpelis, also known as Eleni Lagos, through counsel, filed a renewed request for permission to submit an unredacted amended complaint under seal. The request followed an earlier filing and an order identified as Docket 29. The public amended complaint, identified as Docket 30, contained redactions; the proposed unredacted version was identified as Docket 31.
Reasons for the Request
The request stated that the unredacted amended complaint contained confidential, proprietary, and commercially sensitive information. The listed information included client names and details about BDO USA PC’s client relationships, partnership structure, revenue targets, client accounts, internal personnel matters, and business-development strategies. It specifically identified redacted revenue information concerning BDO’s New York Metro ASC 740 market, emails containing client information, and a text message containing client names.
The request explained that counsel had exchanged communications about proposed redactions before the original complaint was filed. It argued that courts may restrict public access to judicial records when disclosure of business information could harm a litigant’s competitive position, and that the confidential client and business information justified sealing the complete version while preserving public access to the redacted allegations.
Ruling
The court granted the request to file the unredacted amended complaint under seal. The order thus permitted the complete version to remain nonpublic while the redacted amended complaint remained the public filing. Judge Jennifer E. Willis signed the order.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.