Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 18, 2025

Gibson v. The City Municipality of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05566
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil RightsSection 1983Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Gibson v. The City Municipality of New York, Judge Swain dismissed the duplicate lawsuit without prejudice.

Who this affects

Bennie Gibson, the defendants named in this duplicate lawsuit, the Clerk of Court, and the official responsible for Gibson’s prison trust account.

What happened

In Gibson v. The City Municipality of New York, Bennie Gibson, representing himself, brought a civil-rights lawsuit claiming that the defendants violated his federal constitutional rights. The court found that he had filed an identical lawsuit against the same defendants, which was already pending under docket number 25-CV-6009 (LTS).

The court dismissed this lawsuit as duplicative, without prejudice to Gibson’s pending case. It also directed the Clerk not to charge the $350 filing fee and ordered that no money be taken from Gibson’s prison trust account for this lawsuit.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and directed the Clerk to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gibson v. The City Municipality of New York · No. 1:25-cv-05566
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 18, 2025

Background

Bennie Gibson, who was representing himself, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing claims for violations of constitutional rights by persons acting under state law. The opinion states that Gibson was currently detailed in the North Infirmary Command on Rikers Island. He alleged that the defendants violated his federal constitutional rights.

The court stated that Gibson had submitted an identical complaint against the same defendants in another action, No. 25-CV-6009 (LTS), which was pending before the court.

Ruling

The court dismissed the complaint as duplicative because it raised the same claims as the pending action. The dismissal was without prejudice to Gibson’s pending case under docket number 25-CV-6009 (LTS). The court explained that it ordinarily dismisses the action with the higher case number, but dismissed this lower-numbered action because the complaint was photocopied in a way that made it virtually illegible.

The court directed the Clerk of Court not to charge Gibson the $350 filing fee for this action. It also directed the official having custody of Gibson not to deduct or encumber funds from his prison trust account for this lawsuit.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore denied permission to appeal without paying the required fees. The court directed the Clerk to enter judgment in this action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.