Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 19, 2025

Sandoval Abreu v. The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:25-cv-06601
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Sandoval Abreu v. Stop & Shop, Judge Cronan ordered the defendant to clarify its citizenship or face remand to state court.

Who this affects

The defendant must provide additional information about its citizenship to establish federal diversity jurisdiction; otherwise, the case may be remanded to state court.

What happened

Sandoval Abreu v. The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC was removed from New York state court after the defendant claimed the federal court had diversity jurisdiction. The notice identified Christopher Sandoval Abreu as a New York citizen and described the defendant’s ownership structure.

The court explained that a limited liability company has the citizenship of its members. Because the defendant’s sole member is a Delaware corporation, the notice also had to identify that corporation’s principal place of business. The notice did not provide that information.

Judge John P. Cronan ordered the defendant to amend its notice of removal by August 26, 2025, to properly allege the defendant’s citizenship. If it did not do so, or otherwise failed to establish federal jurisdiction, the court said it would remand the case to state court without further notice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sandoval Abreu v. The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC · No. 1:25-cv-06601
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Aug. 19, 2025

Background

The case was removed from the New York Supreme Court for Bronx County on August 18, 2025. The defendant invoked diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), which allows certain disputes between citizens of different states to be heard in federal court.

The removal notice stated that Plaintiff Christopher Sandoval Abreu was a citizen and resident of New York. It described Defendant The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC as a Delaware limited liability company whose sole member was Ahold U.S.A., Inc., a Delaware corporation. The notice also identified the ultimate parent of Ahold U.S.A., Inc. as Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize N.V., a publicly traded limited liability company registered in The Netherlands.

Jurisdictional issue

For diversity-jurisdiction purposes, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members. When a corporation is a member, the corporation is a citizen of both its state of incorporation and the state where it has its principal place of business. The principal place of business is the location where the corporation’s officers direct, control, and coordinate its activities.

The court found that the notice properly identified Ahold U.S.A., Inc. as a Delaware corporation but did not state Ahold U.S.A., Inc.’s principal place of business. The court therefore concluded that the notice did not yet properly allege the citizenship of the defendant’s members for purposes of diversity jurisdiction.

Order

The court ordered Defendant The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC to amend the notice of removal by August 26, 2025, to properly allege the citizenship of the limited liability company’s members. The court stated that if no amended notice was filed by that date, or if the defendant otherwise failed to establish jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2), the court would order the case remanded to state court without further notice.

Judge John P. Cronan did not issue a ruling on the underlying dispute. The order addressed only whether the defendant had adequately established the federal court’s subject-matter jurisdiction.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.