Elia v. Garland
- Vyskocil
- 1:24-cv-03947
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Elia v. Bondi, Judge Vyskocil granted permission to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, denied a PACER-fee waiver, and ordered service by Marshals.
Dr. Souheil E. Elia received permission to proceed without prepaying the filing fee but was denied a PACER-fee waiver. Pamela Bondi is to be served through the U.S. Marshals Service.
What happened
In Elia v. Bondi, Dr. Souheil E. Elia, representing himself, asked to proceed without prepaying the filing fee and asked the court to waive fees for accessing electronic court records. He had already paid the filing fee when he started the case in May 2024.
The court granted permission to proceed without prepaying the filing fee because Elia said he was unemployed, had less than $20, and relied on family and friends for expenses. The court denied his request to waive PACER fees because he did not show that paying them would create an unreasonable burden. The court noted that some PACER access is already free under automatic exemptions.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered the Clerk of Court to issue a summons and prepare the paperwork for the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Pamela Bondi. The court also directed that Elia be mailed an information package and said he must notify the court if his address changes.
The detailed version
- Elia v. Garland · No. 1:24-cv-03947
- Vyskocil
- Aug. 19, 2025
Background
Dr. Souheil E. Elia initiated this case in May 2024 and is proceeding without a lawyer. The opinion identifies Pamela Bondi, the U.S. Attorney General, as the defendant and states that she was automatically substituted for former Attorney General Merrick B. Garland under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). Elia paid the filing fee in May 2024 and later requested permission to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, along with a waiver of fees for accessing the court’s electronic records system, known as PACER.
Permission to Proceed Without Prepaying the Filing Fee
The court granted Elia’s request to proceed without prepaying the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The court relied on his statement that he was unemployed, had less than $20, and depended on family and friends to pay his expenses.
PACER-Fee Waiver
The court denied Elia’s request for a waiver of PACER fees. It explained that the Judicial Conference’s fee schedule already provides several automatic exemptions, including no charge until an account holder accrues more than $30 in a quarterly billing cycle, one free electronic copy of documents when receipt is required or directed, free access to judicial opinions, and free access at courthouse public terminals. A court may grant an additional discretionary exemption only when necessary to avoid unreasonable burdens and promote public access to information. The court found that Elia alleged no facts showing that he would face an unreasonable burden without a further exemption, and that permission to proceed without prepaying the filing fee alone was not enough.
Service of the Defendant
The court noted that no summons had been issued and that proper service had not occurred. Because Elia was permitted to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form with the defendant’s address, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed for service.
The court stated that service should occur within 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, Elia should request an extension of time. The court also stated that Elia must notify the court in writing if his address changes and that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.
Disposition
The court granted Elia’s request to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, denied his request for a PACER-fee waiver, and ordered the Clerk of Court to issue the summons and arrange service through the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Elia an information package and terminate docket entries 21 and 22.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.