Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 21, 2025

Burns v. Griffin

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-06856
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Burns v. Griffin, Judge Swain dismissed Burns’s action and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Who this affects

George Burns’s action against Shannon Griffin was dismissed. The provided judgment does not identify the claims or explain the effect of the dismissal beyond the stated appeal certification.

What happened

In Burns v. Griffin, the court dismissed George Burns’s action against Shannon Griffin, identified as a county law attorney. The judgment gives no further explanation and refers to an August 21, 2025 order that is not included here.

The court also certified under federal law that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment does not state the basis for dismissal or describe the claims.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the judgment on August 21, 2025. The action was dismissed, and the appeal certification was entered as stated in the judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Burns v. Griffin · No. 1:25-cv-06856
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 21, 2025

Ruling

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action brought by George Burns against Shannon Griffin, identified in the caption as a county law attorney in the Bronx, New York. The judgment states that the dismissal was for the reasons given in an August 21, 2025 order, but that order is not included in the provided text.

Appeal Certification

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The provided judgment does not explain the basis for that certification.

Disposition

The action was dismissed. Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on August 21, 2025. Because the referenced dismissal order is not provided, the available text does not show whether the court reached the merits or dismissed the action on a threshold ground.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.