Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 2, 2025

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.70.203.70

Judge
Joseph Spero
Docket
3:25-cv-06512
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureDiscoveryIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge Spero authorized early subpoenas to identify the subscriber linked to an IP address.

Who this affects

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC may seek identifying information from Comcast and other identified internet service providers. The John Doe subscriber and any other affected subscribers must receive notice and may challenge the subpoenas. The providers must preserve the information and may have to produce it if no timely challenge is filed.

What happened

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked to serve a subpoena before the parties held their required initial conference. The subpoena seeks the name and address of the person associated with IP address 73.70.203.70.

The court authorized Strike 3 to subpoena Comcast Cable Communications, LLC and any other internet provider identified in response. The providers must notify affected subscribers, who may challenge or modify the subpoenas within 30 days.

Judge Spero granted the application. The providers must preserve the information, and any information disclosed may be used only to protect Strike 3’s rights under the Copyright Act.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.70.203.70 · No. 3:25-cv-06512
Judge
Joseph Spero
Date
Sept. 2, 2025

Background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC applied for permission to serve a third-party subpoena before the parties held a conference required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). The requested subpoena seeks the true name and address of the defendant to whom Comcast Cable Communications, LLC assigned IP address 73.70.203.70.

Ruling

The court found that Strike 3 had shown “good cause” to obtain the early discovery. It granted the application and authorized Strike 3 to serve Comcast with a subpoena under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45. The subpoena must include a copy of the order.

The court also authorized Strike 3 to serve a similar Rule 45 subpoena on any internet service provider identified in response as providing internet services to the defendant. The order treats the authorized subpoenas as court orders allowing disclosure under 47 U.S.C. § 551, provided the subscriber is notified.

Notice and challenges

Each internet service provider has 30 days after service to give each affected subscriber a copy of the subpoena and the order. Each subscriber and provider then has 30 days after service on that person or entity to file a motion contesting the subpoena, including a motion to quash or modify it. If no timely challenge is filed, the provider has 10 days to produce the responsive information.

The providers must preserve the subpoenaed information until they provide it to Strike 3 or the court finally resolves a timely motion to quash. Any information disclosed may be used only to protect Strike 3’s rights under the Copyright Act. The order also requires information concerning any current or proposed defendant to be filed under seal and not otherwise disclosed.

Disposition

Judge Joseph C. Spero granted Strike 3 Holdings, LLC’s ex parte application for leave to serve a third-party subpoena before the Rule 26(f) conference. The order concerns discovery and does not decide whether the defendant infringed copyright or otherwise resolve the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.