Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 22, 2025

Marte v. Wallkill Correctional Facility

Judge
Komitee
Docket
7:25-cv-06771
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Marte v. Wallkill Correctional Facility, Judge Komitee transferred Marte’s habeas petition to the Southern District of New York because venue was proper there.

Who this affects

Victor Marte’s federal petition challenging his state convictions was moved from the Eastern District of New York to the Southern District of New York.

What happened

Victor Marte filed a federal petition challenging his New York state convictions while incarcerated at Wallkill Correctional Facility. The petition was filed in the Eastern District of New York.

The court explained that habeas petitions may be filed where the person is held or where the state court that convicted and sentenced the person is located. Marte was convicted in Westchester County and held in Ulster County, both within the Southern District of New York, so that district was the proper venue.

Judge Eric Komitee transferred the petition to the Southern District of New York, directed the clerk to close the Eastern District case after transfer, withdrew the earlier order requiring Marte to respond, and waived the usual seven-day delay before transfer.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Marte v. Wallkill Correctional Facility · No. 7:25-cv-06771
Judge
Komitee
Date
July 22, 2025

Background

Victor Marte filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his custody following convictions in Westchester County Court for criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and criminal use of drug paraphernalia in the second degree. The Appellate Division affirmed his conviction in April 2024, and the New York Court of Appeals denied leave to appeal in February 2025. Marte was incarcerated at Wallkill Correctional Facility.

Venue Analysis

The Eastern District of New York held that it was not the proper venue. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), a state prisoner’s habeas petition may be filed in the district where the prisoner is held or in the district where the state court that convicted and sentenced the prisoner is located. The local rules for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York also provide that a New York state prisoner’s habeas petition should be filed in the district where the conviction and sentence occurred.

Marte was convicted and sentenced in Westchester County, and he was held in Ulster County. The court stated that both counties are within the Southern District of New York. It therefore concluded that the Southern District was the proper venue and that transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 was appropriate.

Disposition

The court transferred Marte’s petition to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It directed the clerk to mail Marte a copy of the order and to close the Eastern District case upon transfer. The court also withdrew its July 2 order requiring a response and waived the local rule’s seven-day delay before the transfer took effect. The order did not decide the merits of Marte’s petition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.