Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 22, 2025

Irakli v. Flanagan

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:25-cv-06817
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Irakli v. Flanagan, Judge Cronan ordered a response to Irakli Simsive’s § 2241 petition and denied permission to appeal without paying fees.

Who this affects

Irakli Simsive, Bryan Flanagan and the other respondents, and the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York.

What happened

Irakli Simsive filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 against Bryan Flanagan and others. The order does not describe the petition’s claims or the relief requested.

The court directed the Clerk to notify the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. That office must file an answer or other response within 21 days, and Simsive may file a reply within 14 days after being served with the response.

Judge John P. Cronan also certified that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied Simsive permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The Clerk was directed to mail the order to Simsive at the addresses listed in the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Irakli v. Flanagan · No. 1:25-cv-06817
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Aug. 22, 2025

Nature of the Order

Irakli Simsive filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The opinion does not explain what the petition challenges or state the legal arguments made by either side.

Court’s Directives

After examining the petition, the court ordered the Clerk of Court to electronically notify the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. The U.S. Attorney’s Office must file an answer or other pleadings responding to the petition within 21 days of the order’s date. Simsive may file reply papers within 14 days after being served with the respondents’ response.

Appeal and Mailing Instructions

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees for that appeal. The Clerk was also directed to mail a copy of the order to Simsive at his address of record and at the additional addresses identified in the order.

Disposition

This order does not decide the merits of Simsive’s petition. It directs the respondents to respond and sets a schedule for further filings. The court also denied appeal-related permission to proceed without paying filing fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.