Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 22, 2025

Trustees of the New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Association of New York…

Full caption

Trustees of the New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Health Benefits Fund, Pension Fund, Legal Fund, Scholarship Fund, Industry Training Fund, and 401(k) Savings v. LuxUrban Re Holdings LLC

Judge
Subramanian
Docket
1:25-cv-06886
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Trustees v. LuxUrban Re Holdings LLC, Judge Subramanian set deadlines for briefing and service on a petition to confirm an arbitration award.

Who this affects

The petitioners seeking confirmation of the arbitration award and LuxUrban Re Holdings LLC, the respondent.

What happened

Trustees of the New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Health Benefits Fund, Pension Fund, Legal Fund, Scholarship Fund, Industry Training Fund, and 401(k) Savings filed a petition against LuxUrban Re Holdings LLC to confirm an arbitration award.

The court ordered the petitioners to file any additional supporting materials by September 12, 2025. LuxUrban’s opposition, if any, is due October 3, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, is due October 10. The petitioners must also serve the petition, supporting papers, and the order under Rule 4 by September 12 and file proof of service by September 13.

Judge Subramanian issued a scheduling order and did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees of the New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Association of New York… · No. 1:25-cv-06886
Judge
Subramanian
Date
Aug. 22, 2025

Background

On August 20, 2025, the petitioners filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The court noted that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment, meaning the court considers the parties’ supporting materials under a procedure used to decide cases without a full trial when there is no material factual dispute.

Order

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional materials supporting the petition by September 12, 2025. The respondent’s opposition, if any, is due October 3, 2025, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, is due October 10, 2025.

The petitioners must serve the petition, all supporting papers, and the order on the respondent under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than September 12, 2025. They must file an affidavit confirming service by September 13, 2025.

Result

The order sets briefing and service deadlines. It does not decide whether the arbitration award will be confirmed. Judge Arun Subramanian signed the order on August 22, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.