Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 10, 2025

Khalili v. Noem

Judge
James Donato
Docket
3:25-cv-05570
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
ImmigrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Khalili v. Noem, Judge Donato ordered the stipulated remand of Khalili’s naturalization application to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.

Who this affects

Ahmad Tamim Khalili and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; the defendants agreed to the remand schedule and to not oppose a motion to restore the case if the stated deadlines were missed.

What happened

Ahmad Tamim Khalili sued Kristi Noem and others under a law allowing a federal court to address a naturalization application delayed more than 120 days after an interview. The application was pending before United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.

The parties agreed that the court would send the case back to the agency so it could decide Khalili’s Form N-400 application. The agreement included a planned re-interview during the week of September 22, 2025, deadlines for a decision or further request for evidence, and a promise that the defendants would not oppose a request to restore the case to court if the deadlines were missed.

Judge James Donato ordered the stipulated remand to the agency. Each party must pay its own costs and fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Khalili v. Noem · No. 3:25-cv-05570
Judge
James Donato
Date
Sept. 10, 2025

Background

Ahmad Tamim Khalili brought an action under 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), a provision allowing a district court to address a naturalization application that has remained pending for more than 120 days after the applicant’s interview. The filing states that Khalili asked the court to adjudicate his pending naturalization application, which was before United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

Parties’ Agreement

USCIS stated that it was prepared to adjudicate Khalili’s application but could not do so until the court sent the case back to the agency. Subject to court approval, the parties stipulated that:

- The court would remand the case to USCIS for adjudication of Khalili’s Form N-400, Application for Naturalization. - After the remand order, and absent unforeseen circumstances, USCIS would schedule a re-interview during the week of September 22, 2025. - If USCIS did not require additional evidence after the re-interview, it would issue a final decision or a Notice of Intent to Deny within 45 days of the re-interview, absent unforeseen circumstances. - If USCIS required additional evidence, it would issue a Request for Evidence within 14 days of the re-interview. After receiving Khalili’s response, USCIS would issue a final decision or a Notice of Intent to Deny within 45 days, absent unforeseen circumstances. - If USCIS did not decide the application within those time frames, the defendants would not oppose a motion by Khalili asking the court to vacate the remand order and resume jurisdiction under § 1447(b). - Each party would bear its own costs and fees.

Ruling

Judge James Donato ordered the stipulated remand. The order sends the naturalization application to USCIS for agency adjudication; it does not itself decide whether Khalili will receive naturalization. The order also leaves each party responsible for its own costs and fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.