Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 25, 2025

Edgewood Partners Insurance Center v. PPD Development, L.P.

Judge
Figueredo
Docket
1:22-cv-06957
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Edgewood Partners Insurance Center v. PPD Development, Judge Figueredo granted PPD’s motion to seal its memorandum and provisionally sealed exhibits.

Who this affects

PPD Development, L.P.’s memorandum and exhibits, as well as access to those filings by other participants and the public.

What happened

Edgewood Partners Insurance Center v. PPD Development, L.P. concerns PPD Development’s request to seal or redact parts of its opposition to Edgewood Partners Insurance Center’s motion for reconsideration. PPD said the materials contained information from a confidential 2019 consulting agreement and related consulting fees.

The court granted the motion to seal the memorandum of law. The exhibits identified at ECF No. 114 were provisionally sealed, rather than permanently sealed.

Judge Valerie Figueredo directed PPD to file a motion to permanently seal the exhibits and provide the required justification under the cited Second Circuit standard by September 29, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Edgewood Partners Insurance Center v. PPD Development, L.P. · No. 1:22-cv-06957
Judge
Figueredo
Date
Aug. 25, 2025

Background

PPD Development, L.P. asked for permission to file under seal or with redactions portions of its memorandum opposing Edgewood Partners Insurance Center’s motion for reconsideration. PPD also asked to seal Exhibits A, D, E, and F to a declaration by Julian Brod. According to PPD’s request, the materials included text from, described, or contained information about a confidential 2019 consulting agreement and consulting fees owed or allegedly owed under that agreement. PPD stated that the exhibits were designated confidential under a protective order and that the court had previously granted similar sealing requests.

Ruling

The court granted the motion to seal the memorandum of law. The order states that the materials at ECF No. 114 were provisionally sealed. PPD must file a motion to permanently seal those documents and make the required showing under Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006), by September 29, 2025. The provided order text is cut off at the end, so it does not show any additional instructions beyond that deadline and requirement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.