Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 16, 2025

Williams v. Monterey County Jail

Judge
Kandis Westmore
Docket
3:25-cv-03043
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Williams v. Monterey County Jail, Judge Chen dismissed the complaint without prejudice because Williams did not comply with the court’s address-update rule.

Who this affects

The dismissal affects Rickey Wayne Williams’s complaint against Monterey County Jail. The court dismissed the matter without prejudice and closed the file.

What happened

In Williams v. Monterey County Jail, Rickey Wayne Williams filed a complaint and asked to proceed without paying the filing fee. Court correspondence about problems with his application was returned as undeliverable, as were several later mailings.

More than five months passed without the court receiving an amended complaint, a request for more time, or any other communication from Williams. The court found that he failed to comply with Civil Local Rule 3-11.

Judge Edward M. Chen dismissed the matter without prejudice, directed the clerk to terminate all pending motions, and closed the file.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams v. Monterey County Jail · No. 3:25-cv-03043
Judge
Kandis Westmore
Date
Sept. 16, 2025

Background

Rickey Wayne Williams filed a complaint and a motion for permission to proceed without paying the filing fee on March 26, 2025. The court later sent correspondence about deficiencies in his filing-fee application, but that correspondence was returned as undeliverable. Several other pieces of court mail were also returned.

Failure to Update Address or Communicate

More than five months after the first returned mailing, the court had not received an amended complaint, a request for an extension of time, or any other communication from Williams. The court determined that Williams had failed to comply with Civil Local Rule 3-11, which the opinion applied to the address and communication problem.

Disposition

The court dismissed the matter without prejudice. It also directed the clerk to terminate all pending motions and close the file. The order did not decide the underlying allegations in the complaint.

Judge and Metadata Note

The opinion is signed by Edward M. Chen, United States District Judge. The supplied case metadata identifies Kandis Westmore as the judge, so the summary uses the judge named in the signed opinion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.