Casanares v. FreshRealm, Inc.
- Kandis Westmore
- 4:25-cv-04249
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 9
In Casanares v. FreshRealm, Judge Westmore denied remand, finding the proposed class action’s amount in controversy exceeded $5 million under the Class Action Fairness Act.
Rhonda Casanares, the proposed class members, and FreshRealm, Inc.; the ruling keeps the proposed class action in federal court but does not decide the merits of the wage-and-hour claims.
What happened
Rhonda Casanares filed a proposed class action against FreshRealm, Inc., alleging violations of California wage-and-hour laws on behalf of current and former non-exempt California employees. FreshRealm removed the case to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act, which allows certain qualifying class actions to proceed in federal court.
Casanares asked the court to send the case back to state court, arguing that FreshRealm had not shown that more than $5 million was at stake. FreshRealm relied on personnel, timekeeping, and payroll data and estimated the value of the meal-break, rest-break, overtime, waiting-time, and wage-statement claims.
Judge Kandis Westmore denied Casanares’s motion to remand. The court found that the claims placed at least $7,685,035.03 in controversy, exceeding the Class Action Fairness Act’s $5 million threshold, without needing to include estimated attorneys’ fees.
The detailed version
- Casanares v. FreshRealm, Inc. · No. 4:25-cv-04249
- Kandis Westmore
- Sept. 23, 2025
Background
Rhonda Casanares brought a proposed class action against FreshRealm, Inc., alleging violations of various California Labor Code provisions. She sought to represent current and former non-exempt employees who worked for FreshRealm in California. The alleged violations included unpaid wages and overtime, missed meal and rest periods, inaccurate wage statements, and untimely payment of wages after separation from employment.
FreshRealm removed the case from state court under the Class Action Fairness Act, or CAFA. CAFA gives federal courts jurisdiction over certain class actions when, among other requirements, the proposed class has at least 100 members and the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million. FreshRealm asserted that the amount in controversy exceeded that threshold.
Motion to Remand
Casanares moved to remand, meaning she asked the federal court to return the case to state court. She challenged FreshRealm’s calculations and argued that the assumptions used to estimate the amount in controversy were speculative. FreshRealm opposed the motion.
Court’s Analysis
The court held that FreshRealm had to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that more than $5 million was at stake. The court found sufficient support in personnel records and reports generated from timekeeping and payroll data for FreshRealm’s estimate of approximately 775 proposed class members, 30,751 aggregate workweeks, and an average hourly wage of $20.35.
For meal-break violations, FreshRealm estimated $1,251,566 using a twice-per-week violation assumption. For rest-break violations, it estimated $1,877,349 using a 30% violation rate. The court found both assumptions reasonable because the complaint alleged a pattern, practice, and policy of denying compliant meal and rest periods. Together, these amounts totaled $3,128,915.
For unpaid overtime, FreshRealm estimated one hour of unpaid overtime per week. The court calculated that claim at $938,828.03 and found the assumption reasonable because Casanares treated the claim as derivative of the alleged meal- and rest-break violations. This increased the amount in controversy to $4,067,743.03.
FreshRealm estimated waiting-time penalties of $2,261,292 for 463 terminated employees. The court found the estimate reasonable because the claim was tied to the other wage claims and FreshRealm based the number of terminated employees on a report covering the relevant period. This brought the cumulative amount in controversy to $6,329,035.03.
FreshRealm also estimated $1,356,000 in wage-statement penalties. The court found that estimate reasonable based on the allegations of missed meal and rest periods, the employees’ weekly pay periods, and the alleged failure to pay amounts owed. The cumulative amount then reached $7,685,035.03. Because the claims themselves exceeded $5 million, the court did not need to include estimated attorneys’ fees in the amount in controversy.
Disposition
The court found that FreshRealm demonstrated that the amount in controversy exceeded CAFA’s $5 million jurisdictional threshold. Judge Kandis Westmore therefore denied Casanares’s motion to remand. The opinion addressed federal jurisdiction over the proposed class action and did not decide whether the alleged California wage-and-hour violations occurred.
Read the full 9-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.