Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 27, 2025

Cooper Electric Supply, LLC v. Agir Electrical, Ltd

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:25-cv-03073
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Cooper Electric Supply v. Agir Electrical, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by September 26, 2025.

Who this affects

Cooper Electric Supply, LLC; Agir Electrical, Ltd.; and Antony Gironta. The action was discontinued based on the parties’ settlement in principle, subject to the stated deadline and conditions for restoration.

What happened

Cooper Electric Supply, LLC v. Agir Electrical, Ltd. involved Cooper Electric Supply, Agir Electrical, Ltd., and Antony Gironta. The court received a joint letter stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it if the parties could not put their settlement in writing. Any request to restore the action had to be made by September 26, 2025.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no request to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cooper Electric Supply, LLC v. Agir Electrical, Ltd · No. 1:25-cv-03073
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Aug. 27, 2025

Background

Cooper Electric Supply, LLC, doing business as Cooper Electric Supply NY, LLC, sued Agir Electrical, Ltd., doing business as Pinnacle Electric, and Antony Gironta. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims. Cooper Electric Supply filed a joint letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties could not memorialize their settlement in writing. The parties had until September 26, 2025, to apply to restore the action. The court further ordered that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil signed the order on August 27, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.