Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 26, 2025

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.15.123.29

Judge
Joseph Spero
Docket
3:25-cv-07504
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
DiscoveryCivil ProcedureIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge Spero authorized early subpoenas to identify the subscriber, with notice and an opportunity to object.

Who this affects

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC may seek the subscriber’s identifying information from Comcast and other identified internet service providers. The John Doe subscriber and any other affected subscribers receive notice and an opportunity to challenge the subpoenas, while the providers must preserve the information and comply with the order’s procedures.

What happened

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked the Northern District of California for permission to serve a subpoena before the parties held their required initial conference. The subpoena sought information identifying the person assigned the listed internet address.

The court found good cause and authorized Strike 3 to subpoena Comcast Cable Communications, LLC for the defendant’s true name and address. Strike 3 may also subpoena another internet provider identified through the subpoena process.

The order requires notice to affected subscribers, gives subscribers and providers 30 days to challenge a subpoena, and limits use of disclosed information to protecting rights under the Copyright Act. Judge Spero issued the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.15.123.29 · No. 3:25-cv-07504
Judge
Joseph Spero
Date
Sept. 26, 2025

Background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC filed an ex parte application for permission to serve a third-party subpoena before the parties’ Rule 26(f) conference. The subpoena concerns John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 73.15.123.29 and seeks information that could identify the subscriber.

Court’s ruling

The court found that Strike 3 had established good cause to serve a subpoena on Comcast Cable Communications, LLC. The court authorized Strike 3 to serve Comcast with a subpoena under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 commanding Comcast to provide the defendant’s true name and address. A copy of the order must accompany the subpoena.

The court also authorized Strike 3 to serve the same type of subpoena on any service provider identified in response to a subpoena as providing internet services to the defendant. The order refers to Comcast and those providers collectively as the internet service providers.

Notice and challenges

The order treats the authorized subpoenas as court orders under 47 U.S.C. § 551. Each provider has 30 days after being served to give each affected subscriber a copy of the subpoena and the order, using any reasonable method, including first-class mail or overnight service to the subscriber’s last known address.

Each subscriber and provider then has 30 days after service to file a motion contesting the subpoena, including a motion to quash or modify it. If that period expires without a challenge, the provider has 10 days to produce the responsive information concerning that subscriber. Providers must preserve the subpoenaed information while awaiting production or the final resolution of a timely motion to quash.

Limits on disclosed information

Information produced in response to a subpoena may be used only to protect Strike 3’s rights under the Copyright Act. The order also requires information concerning any current or proposed defendant to be filed under seal in court filings and not otherwise disclosed.

Judge Joseph C. Spero entered the order on September 26, 2025. The order addresses early discovery and identification of the subscriber; it does not decide the underlying copyright dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.