Thomas Simpson and Sue Simpson v. iFIT
Thomas Simpson and Sue Simpson v. iFIT, INC. (f/k/a ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (erroneously sued as Livermore Cost)
- Haywood Gilliam
- 4:24-cv-08707
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 22
In Thomas Simpson v. iFIT, Judge Gilliam granted leave to amend the complaint, adding a repair company and removing NordicTrack.
Thomas Simpson and Sue Simpson may file the First Amended Complaint; iFIT, INC. and Costco Wholesale Corporation must respond within 30 days after it is filed, and Rocky Mountain Fitness Repair, LLC is named as an additional defendant in the proposed amended complaint.
What happened
In Thomas Simpson and Sue Simpson v. iFIT, INC. and Costco Wholesale Corporation, the plaintiffs alleged that Thomas Simpson was injured when a NordicTrack treadmill suddenly sped up and caused him to fall onto its moving belt. They sought damages based on product and repair-related claims.
The parties agreed that the plaintiffs could file a First Amended Complaint. The proposed amendment would add Rocky Mountain Fitness Repair, LLC as a defendant, add negligence and repair-warranty allegations against it, and remove NordicTrack, Inc. as a defendant.
Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. granted leave to file the amended complaint. He ordered the defendants to respond within 30 days after it was filed and directed counsel to file the amended complaint as a separate docket entry.
The detailed version
- Thomas Simpson and Sue Simpson v. iFIT · No. 4:24-cv-08707
- Haywood Gilliam
- Sept. 30, 2025
Background
Thomas Simpson and Sue Simpson filed a damages action alleging product liability and related claims. The complaint alleged that on June 6, 2024, Thomas Simpson was using a NordicTrack treadmill when it unexpectedly sped up, causing him to fall onto the moving belt and suffer a third-degree burn. Costco Wholesale Corporation removed the action from California state court to the federal district court.
The parties previously filed a stipulation for dismissal without prejudice of NordicTrack, Inc. The plaintiffs then sought permission to file a First Amended Complaint. The proposed amendment would add Rocky Mountain Fitness Repair, LLC as a defendant and allege negligence and breach of warranty for good and workmanlike repair and maintenance services. It would also remove NordicTrack, Inc., which the original case had identified as a defendant under the name Nordic Track.
The proposed amended complaint asserted six causes of action: negligence, strict product liability, negligence-based product liability, breach of express and implied warranties, breach of repair and maintenance warranties, and loss of consortium. These were allegations in the proposed complaint; the order did not decide whether any defendant was liable.
Ruling
Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. granted the plaintiffs leave to file the First Amended Complaint for Damages. He ordered that the defendants’ responsive pleading would be due 30 days after the amended complaint was filed. He also directed counsel to file the amended complaint as a stand-alone docket filing. The order did not rule on the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims.
Read the full 22-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.