Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 28, 2025

Campos v. Doe

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05723
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Campos v. United States, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-free appeal status, but the judgment does not explain why.

Who this affects

Vladymir Campos, whose action was dismissed and whose request to appeal without paying filing fees was denied.

What happened

Campos v. United States was dismissed by judgment dated August 28, 2025. The judgment refers to an August 27 order for the reasons, but that order is not included here.

The court also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Vladymir Campos permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The judgment does not state the underlying basis for dismissal.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment. Because the referenced August 27 order is unavailable, the record provided does not show whether the dismissal reached the underlying legal issues.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Campos v. Doe · No. 1:25-cv-05723
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 28, 2025

Ruling

The court entered judgment dismissing the action. It stated that the reasons for dismissal were set out in an August 27, 2025, order, which is not included in the provided opinion text.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Vladymir Campos permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962).

Unclear from the Provided Text

The judgment does not identify the claims, the facts, or the legal basis for dismissal. It therefore does not establish from the provided text whether the dismissal was based on a threshold issue or on the merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.