Fagnani v. Lifecell Supplements LLC
Mykayla Fagnani, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Lifecell Supplements LLC
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:25-cv-05109
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Fagnani v. Lifecell Supplements, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled-in-principle case without costs, allowing restoration within 45 days.
Mykayla Fagnani, the people she sought to represent, and Lifecell Supplements LLC. The case was closed, subject to a possible application to restore it within 45 days.
What happened
Mykayla Fagnani brought this action against Lifecell Supplements LLC on behalf of herself and others similarly situated. The court was told that the case had been settled in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket if an application was made within 45 days. The court also stated that any later application to reopen could be denied solely because it was late.
Judge Ronnie Abrams directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. The order does not describe the settlement terms or state that the settlement received final approval; it says the parties could ask the court to retain enforcement jurisdiction only if the agreement’s terms were placed on the public record and approved by the court within the stated period.
The detailed version
- Fagnani v. Lifecell Supplements LLC · No. 1:25-cv-05109
- Ronnie Abrams
- Sept. 2, 2025
Background
The opinion states that the court was informed that the action had been settled in principle. It does not provide the settlement’s terms, identify the claims, or state that the court approved a final settlement.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 45 days. The court stated that any application to reopen filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late.
The court further stated that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period identified in the order. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.
Effect
This order closed the case without deciding the underlying claims. It preserved a limited opportunity to seek restoration within 45 days and described a process for seeking continued court enforcement of a settlement. Judge Ronnie Abrams did not make a merits ruling in the text provided.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.