Ty v. Sigma Systems
Mitchelle Ty v. Sigma Systems, Inc., Nathaniel Lee Fischer, and Evismari Ferreras
- Vyskocil
- 1:24-cv-07124
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Mitchelle Ty v. Sigma Systems, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by October 6, 2025.
Mitchelle Ty and Sigma Systems, Inc., Nathaniel Lee Fischer, and Evismari Ferreras, whose action was discontinued subject to the stated restoration deadline.
What happened
In Mitchelle Ty v. Sigma Systems, the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to any party. It allowed the parties to ask to restore the case if they could not put their settlement in writing, but the request had to be made by October 6, 2025.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that, if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The court also postponed all other dates and deadlines without setting new dates.
The detailed version
- Ty v. Sigma Systems · No. 1:24-cv-07124
- Vyskocil
- Sept. 4, 2025
Background
The court received a letter from the parties stating that they had reached a settlement in principle. The order does not describe the claims or the settlement's terms.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The discontinuance was without prejudice to restoring the action to the court's calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and an application to restore the action was made by October 6, 2025.
The order further states that, if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. It also adjourned all other dates and deadlines without setting new dates. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil signed the order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.