Grimes v. Worldwide Nutritional Supplements 1440 Foods
Robert Grimes v. Worldwide Nutritional Supplements 1440 Foods, Stephen Sisti, Anthony Donahue, and John Doe
- Vyskocil
- 1:25-cv-02904
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
Grimes v. Worldwide Sport Nutritional Supplements 1440 Foods: Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after settlement, subject to possible restoration by October 20, 2025.
Robert Grimes and the defendants—Worldwide Sport Nutritional Supplements 1440 Foods, Stephen Sisti, Anthony Donahue, and John Doe—are affected by the discontinuance and the October 20, 2025 deadline for seeking restoration.
What happened
In Robert Grimes v. Worldwide Sport Nutritional Supplements 1440 Foods, Stephen Sisti, Anthony Donahue, and John Doe, the parties told the court they had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and applied for restoration by October 20, 2025.
If no application to restore the action is made by that date, the dismissal will be with prejudice. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil also adjourned all other dates and deadlines indefinitely.
The detailed version
- Grimes v. Worldwide Nutritional Supplements 1440 Foods · No. 1:25-cv-02904
- Vyskocil
- Sept. 4, 2025
Background The parties informed the court by letter that they had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the claims or the settlement’s terms.
Ruling The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The action could be restored to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and an application to restore the action was made by October 20, 2025.
If no restoration application was made by that date, the court stated that the dismissal would be with prejudice. The court also adjourned all other dates and deadlines indefinitely. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.