Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 5, 2025

Wolfhope v. Rikers Island DOC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-07065
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Tymier Wolfhope v. Rikers Island DOC, Judge Swain ordered payment or a completed fee-waiver application within 30 days before the case proceeds.

Who this affects

Tymier Wolfhope, the detained plaintiff representing himself, must either pay the required fees or submit the required application and prisoner authorization within 30 days for the action to proceed.

What happened

In Tymier Wolfhope v. Rikers Island DOC; Bob Barker Authorization Company Inc., Tymier Wolfhope filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting completed forms to proceed without paying fees upfront. The order states that he is detained at the Otis Bantum Correctional Center and is representing himself.

The court gave Wolfhope 30 days from September 5, 2025, to either pay $405 in fees or submit a signed application to proceed without paying fees upfront and a prisoner authorization. That authorization would allow filing-fee payments to be deducted from his account in installments. No summons will issue yet.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that the case be processed if Wolfhope complies and stated that the action will be dismissed if he does not. She also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Wolfhope v. Rikers Island DOC · No. 1:25-cv-07065
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 5, 2025

Background

Tymier Wolfhope filed this civil action without a filing fee, a completed application to proceed without paying fees upfront, or a prisoner authorization. The order states that Wolfhope is detained at the Otis Bantum Correctional Center on Rikers Island and is proceeding without a lawyer.

Fees and required forms

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $405—the $350 filing fee and $55 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepaying fees. A prisoner requesting that permission must submit a signed application and a prisoner authorization. If permission is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the $350 filing fee to be collected in installments from the prisoner's account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to send the court certified copies of the prisoner's account statements for the past six months.

Order

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered Wolfhope, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $405 in fees or submit the required application and prisoner authorization. The documents must identify docket number 25-CV-7065 (LTS). No summons will issue at this time. If Wolfhope complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk's Office procedures; if he does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.

The court certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The order also cautioned that certain future dismissals of prisoner civil actions can count as filing "strikes" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.