Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 5, 2025

Broder v. Westchester County Department of Corrections

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
7:25-cv-07360
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Broder v. Westchester County Department of Corrections, Judge Swain ordered Justin D. Broder to pay fees or submit authorization within 30 days.

Who this affects

Justin D. Broder, who must either pay the required fees or submit the prisoner authorization within 30 days for the case to proceed.

What happened

Justin D. Broder v. Westchester County Department of Corrections is a civil case brought by Broder, who is incarcerated at Westchester County Jail and is representing himself. He submitted an application to proceed without paying fees upfront but did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

The court ordered Broder, within 30 days, either to pay the $405 filing and administrative fees or to submit the authorization. That authorization would allow prison officials to deduct the $350 filing fee from his account in installments and provide the court with account statements. The court said no summons would issue yet.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain stated that the case would be processed if Broder complies and would be dismissed if he does not comply within the allowed time. She also denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Broder v. Westchester County Department of Corrections · No. 7:25-cv-07360
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 5, 2025

Background

Justin D. Broder, who is incarcerated at Westchester County Jail, filed this civil action without a lawyer. The opinion states that a prisoner must either pay $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepaying fees. That request is commonly called an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or IFP.

Broder submitted an IFP application but did not submit the required prisoner authorization. Under the cited federal statutes, the authorization directs the facility holding the prisoner to deduct the $350 filing fee from the prisoner’s account in installments and send the court certified account statements for the previous six months. The $55 administrative fee does not apply to a person who is granted IFP status.

Court’s Order

The court ordered Broder to do one of two things within 30 days of the order: pay the full $405 in fees, or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 25-CV-7360 (LTS). No summons would issue at that time.

The court stated that, if Broder complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order cautioned that certain future dismissals of prisoner cases can count as strikes under the federal prisoner-litigation statute, but it did not state that this case had received a strike.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.