Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 28, 2025

Bonilla v. David Anthony et. al.

Judge
Phyllis Hamilton
Docket
4:25-cv-08768
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
Civil RightsPro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Steven Wayne Bonilla v. David Anthony, Judge Hamilton dismissed 20 civil-rights cases with prejudice after finding Bonilla could not proceed without paying fees and his claims were barred.

Who this affects

Steven Wayne Bonilla’s 20 civil-rights cases and the federal judges, state judges, and other government officials he named as defendants.

What happened

Steven Wayne Bonilla, a state prisoner, filed 20 similar civil-rights lawsuits without a lawyer against federal judges, state judges, and other government officials. He sought relief concerning his conviction and the handling of his other cases.

The court found that Bonilla could not proceed without paying filing fees because he had previously been barred from proceeding without fees and had not shown that he faced an immediate risk of serious physical injury when he filed the complaints. The court also said the lawsuits would be barred under several legal rules even if he had been allowed to proceed without paying fees.

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton dismissed all 20 cases with prejudice, directed the clerk to terminate pending motions and close the cases, and ordered that future documents Bonilla submits in those cases be returned without filing.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bonilla v. David Anthony et. al. · No. 4:25-cv-08768
Judge
Phyllis Hamilton
Date
Oct. 28, 2025

Background

Steven Wayne Bonilla, identified in the order as a state prisoner and a condemned prisoner, filed multiple civil-rights complaints under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal statute that allows certain claims against government officials. He filed the cases without a lawyer. The complaints presented nearly identical claims against various federal judges, state judges, and other government officials. Bonilla sought relief concerning his underlying conviction or the way his state and federal cases had been handled.

The order notes that Bonilla has a pending federal petition challenging his imprisonment, with appointed counsel, and is represented by counsel in state proceedings concerning that petition.

Reasons for Dismissal

The court stated that Bonilla had previously been disqualified from proceeding without paying filing fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). That statute generally prevents a prisoner with the required history of frivolous or otherwise qualifying filings from proceeding without paying fees unless the complaint shows that the prisoner faced an imminent danger of serious physical injury when the complaint was filed. The court found that Bonilla’s allegations did not show such danger. He therefore could not proceed without paying the filing fees.

The court further stated that, even if Bonilla had been allowed to proceed without paying fees, the lawsuits would be barred under the legal rules discussed in Heck v. Humphrey, Younger v. Harris, Demos v. U.S. District Court, and Mullis v. U.S. Bankruptcy Court. The order did not reach the underlying merits of Bonilla’s claims.

The court also stated that the repetitive and allegedly frivolous nature of the filings did not provide a reason to question the undersigned judge’s impartiality. It cited the principle that, absent a legitimate reason for disqualification, a judge has a duty to decide cases assigned to that judge.

Disposition

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton dismissed the cases with prejudice. The clerk was directed to terminate all pending motions and close the cases. The clerk was also directed to return, without filing, any further documents Bonilla submits in the closed cases.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.