Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 8, 2025

Scott v. Rikers Island DOC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-07068
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ashaunte Scott v. Rikers Island DOC, Judge Swain ordered payment or an IFP application and authorization, warning the case will be dismissed otherwise.

Who this affects

Ashaunte Scott and the pending action, which will proceed only if Scott timely pays the fees or submits the required forms.

What happened

Ashaunte Scott sued Rikers Island DOC and Bob Barker Authorization Company Inc. without a lawyer. The opinion says Scott is detained at the Otis Bantum Correctional Center on Rikers Island.

Scott filed the complaint without paying the required fees and without completing an application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization. The court gave Scott 30 days to pay $405 or submit the required forms, labeled with docket number 25-CV-7068.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that no summons issue yet and said the case will be processed if Scott complies. If Scott does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed. The court also denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Scott v. Rikers Island DOC · No. 1:25-cv-07068
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 8, 2025

Background

Ashaunte Scott brought this civil action without a lawyer. The opinion states that Scott is currently detained at the Otis Bantum Correctional Center on Rikers Island. Scott submitted the complaint without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Fee and filing requirements

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. If the court grants the application, the $350 filing fee is collected in installments from the prisoner's account. The prisoner authorization also directs the facility to make those deductions and provide certified account statements for the previous six months. The $55 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order

The court ordered Scott, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $405 in fees or submit the required application and prisoner authorization. The forms should identify docket number 25-CV-7068. No summons will issue at this time. If Scott complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk's Office procedures; if Scott does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order cautioned that certain future dismissals of prisoner civil actions may count as strikes under federal law, and that three strikes can limit a prisoner's ability to proceed without prepaying fees unless an imminent danger exception applies.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.