Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 8, 2025

Trustees of the New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Association of New York…

Full caption

Trustees of the New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Health Benefits Fund, Pension Fund, Legal Fund, Scholarship Fund, and Industry Training Fund v. LuxUrban Hotels Inc. d/b/a The Washington by LuxUrban

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:25-cv-07345
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Trustees v. LuxUrban Hotels, Judge Engelmayer set briefing and service deadlines for a petition to confirm an arbitral award.

Who this affects

The petitioner trustees and funds, and LuxUrban Hotels Inc. d/b/a The Washington by LuxUrban, are affected by the briefing and service deadlines.

What happened

Trustees of the New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Health Benefits Fund, Pension Fund, Legal Fund, Scholarship Fund, and Industry Training Fund v. LuxUrban Hotels Inc. concerns a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award.

The petitioner filed the petition on September 4, 2025. The court ordered the petitioner’s supporting memorandum by September 29, the respondent’s opposition by October 14, and any petitioner reply by October 21. The petitioner also had to serve the order, petition, and supporting papers on the respondent and file proof of service by September 15.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer set the briefing and service schedule. The order did not decide whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees of the New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Association of New York… · No. 1:25-cv-07345
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Sept. 8, 2025

Background

The petitioner filed a petition on September 4, 2025, seeking confirmation of an arbitral award. Confirmation is the court process for asking that an arbitration award be recognized and enforced. The court stated that proceedings to confirm an arbitral award are treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment, which is a procedure for deciding a case when the relevant facts are not genuinely disputed.

Briefing and Service Schedule

The court ordered the following deadlines:

- The petitioner’s memorandum supporting the petition was due September 29, 2025. - The respondent’s opposition was due October 14, 2025. - The petitioner’s reply, if any, was due October 21, 2025.

The petitioner also had to promptly serve the order, the petition, and supporting papers on the respondent and file proof of service on the docket by September 15, 2025.

Ruling

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer set the briefing and service schedule. The order did not rule on whether the arbitral award should be confirmed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.