Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 10, 2025

Quizhpi v. Spa Management Service Inc.

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:23-cv-00906
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Quizhpi v. Spa Management Service, Judge Ramos granted the parties’ request to extend the settlement-agreement deadline to October 8, 2025.

Who this affects

The parties to the case, who received an extension to submit their settlement agreement for court review.

What happened

In Quizhpi et al v. Spa Management Service Inc. et al., the parties had been directed to submit their settlement agreement for court review. An earlier order set September 10, 2025, as the filing deadline.

The parties requested a 30-day extension, explaining that loan applications and the banks’ documentation requirements had delayed the process. The letter stated that this was the second extension request.

Judge Edgardo Ramos granted the request and directed the parties to submit the settlement agreement for court review by October 8, 2025, under the procedure described in the cited appellate decision.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Quizhpi v. Spa Management Service Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-00906
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Sept. 10, 2025

Background

The court had previously directed the parties to file their settlement agreement for court review under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The earlier order set September 10, 2025, as the filing deadline.

The Request

Defense counsel, with the consent of plaintiffs’ counsel, requested a 30-day extension through October 8, 2025. Counsel stated that the client had submitted loan applications to several locations and lending institutions, but that the banks required substantial documentation and the approval process was taking longer than expected. Counsel also stated that this was the second request for an extension.

Ruling

Judge Edgardo Ramos granted the parties’ request. The court directed the parties to submit their settlement agreement for court review by October 8, 2025, pursuant to the procedure cited in Cheeks.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.