Morales v. Uveral Meat Market & Grocery Corp.
Marcos Morales, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Uveral Meat Market & Grocery Corp., Jahn Cruz Ynfante, Mayelin Cruz and Jonathan Vargas
- Vyskocil
- 1:24-cv-08609
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
Morales v. Uveral Meat Market, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, subject to possible restoration by October 10, 2025.
Marcos Morales, the defendants, and the other people he sought to represent were affected by the discontinuance of the action. Pending deadlines and the October 28, 2025 conference were also adjourned.
What happened
In Marcos Morales v. Uveral Meat Market & Grocery Corp., the court was informed by the mediator that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the claims or the proposed settlement terms.
The court discontinued the action without costs to any party. The case could be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and an application to restore was filed by October 10, 2025.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil also adjourned all pending deadlines and the October 28, 2025 conference indefinitely. If no restoration application was filed by October 10, the dismissal would become with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Morales v. Uveral Meat Market & Grocery Corp. · No. 1:24-cv-08609
- Vyskocil
- Sept. 10, 2025
Background
The Southern District of New York stated that the mediator had informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not state the claims asserted, the settlement amount, or any other settlement terms.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by October 10, 2025. The order further stated that if no application was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice.
The court also ordered that all pending deadlines and the October 28, 2025 conference be adjourned indefinitely. This was a case-management and settlement-related disposition; the opinion does not report a decision on the underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.