Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 9, 2025

Berguette

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04529
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil RightsSection 1983Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In re: Gotti Berguette, Judge Torres added New York City as a defendant in a conditions-of-confinement case under Rule 21.

Who this affects

Gotti Berguette and the City of New York. The order adds the City as a defendant in Berguette’s federal constitutional-rights lawsuit; it does not decide the merits of the claims.

What happened

In In re: Gotti Berguette, Gotti Berguette, who is representing himself, alleged that conditions at West Facility on Rikers Island violated federal constitutional rights. The complaint described problems involving sanitation, plumbing, and mail service, but it did not formally name a defendant in its caption.

The court concluded that the complaint clearly intended to bring claims against the City of New York because the city’s Department of Correction operates West Facility. It directed the Clerk of Court to add the City as a defendant and notify the relevant city departments. The order did not decide whether the alleged conditions violated the Constitution.

Judge Analisa Torres issued the order on September 9, 2025. The City’s addition was stated to be without prejudice to any defenses it may assert, and the court requested that the City waive formal service of the lawsuit.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Berguette · No. 1:25-cv-04529
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 9, 2025

Background

Gotti Berguette is detained at West Facility on Rikers Island and brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing claims for violations of federal constitutional rights by persons acting under state law. Berguette is proceeding without a lawyer and alleges that conditions of confinement—including sanitation, plumbing, and mail-service conditions—violate federal constitutional rights.

The complaint did not include a caption naming an opposing party. The Clerk of Court therefore captioned the case without a formally designated adverse party. An earlier order allowed Berguette to proceed without prepaying filing fees, although the court noted that prisoners remain responsible for the full filing fee under the applicable statute.

Court’s action

The court relied on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, which allows a court, on a motion or on its own, to add or remove a party at any time on appropriate terms. The court explained that this rule gives courts discretion to shape litigation in the interests of efficiency and justice, including adding as a defendant a party mentioned throughout a complaint as being involved in the alleged events.

Because the New York City Department of Correction operates West Facility, and because Berguette’s complaint showed a clear intention to assert claims against the City of New York, the court construed the complaint as asserting claims against the City. It directed the Clerk of Court to add the City of New York as a defendant under Rule 21 and to notify the New York City Department of Correction and the New York City Law Department. The court requested that the City waive service of summons and stated that the amendment was without prejudice to any defenses the City may assert.

What the order did not decide

The order addressed the identification and addition of a defendant. It did not decide whether the conditions at West Facility violated Berguette’s constitutional rights or otherwise resolve the merits of the § 1983 claims. Judge Analisa Torres also directed the Clerk to mail Berguette a copy of the order and an information package.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.