Pace v. Jordan
- Laura Swain
- 1:25-cv-06654
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Pace v. Jordan, Judge Swain granted fee-waiver status but denied emergency relief and counsel, allowing Pace 30 days to file a complaint.
Michael Thomas Pace’s requests for emergency relief, counsel, private review, and a remote hearing were denied or terminated, while his application to proceed without paying court fees was granted. The order also gave him 30 days to file a complaint or move to withdraw the action.
What happened
In Michael Thomas Pace v. Casey Jordan, et al., Michael Thomas Pace, representing himself, asked for emergency court orders, a temporary restraining order, a preliminary injunction, and a lawyer without conflicts. He also asked for a private court review and a remote hearing, and sought permission to proceed without paying court fees.
The court granted Pace permission to proceed without paying court fees. It denied his emergency requests for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, as well as his request for counsel. The court said his filings did not show a likely win, sufficiently serious legal questions, or a hardship balance strongly favoring him. The emergency motions were denied without prejudice.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain allowed Pace 30 days to file a complaint or instead ask to withdraw the case. She directed the Clerk to terminate the emergency motions and the motion seeking private review and a remote hearing. The court also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Pace v. Jordan · No. 1:25-cv-06654
- Laura Swain
- Sept. 8, 2025
Background
Michael Thomas Pace, who was proceeding without a lawyer, filed an emergency motion seeking a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunctive relief, and the appointment of conflict-free counsel. He filed a second emergency motion seeking the same relief. He also filed a motion requesting private judicial review and a remote hearing, along with an application to proceed without paying court fees.
Court’s analysis
The court explained that preliminary injunctive relief is an extraordinary remedy. To obtain it, Pace had to show that he was likely to suffer irreparable harm and either was likely to succeed on the merits or had sufficiently serious legal questions combined with a balance of hardships strongly favoring him.
The court found that Pace’s submissions did not demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or sufficiently serious legal questions with the required balance of hardships. The court also noted that a later letter referred to Pace’s property in New Milford, Connecticut, which suggested that the action might not have arisen within a county in the Southern District of New York. The opinion does not provide a ruling resolving venue on that point.
Rulings
The court granted Pace’s application to proceed without paying court fees. It denied his requests for a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunctive relief, and appointment of counsel. The court stated that the emergency motions were denied without prejudice. It directed the Clerk to terminate those motions and the motion seeking private review and a remote hearing.
The court granted Pace leave to file a complaint within 30 days of the order. Alternatively, Pace could move to withdraw the action. The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for purposes of an appeal.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.