Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 16, 2025

Garcia v. Vista on 5th

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:25-cv-00494
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Garcia v. Vista on 5th, Judge Carter granted a two-week extension for filing settlement papers.

Who this affects

The parties in Garcia, Jacinto v. Vista on 5th, whose deadline to file settlement materials was extended from September 17 to October 1, 2025.

What happened

In Garcia, Jacinto v. Vista on 5th, the parties were required to file a proposed settlement and a joint legal memorandum by September 17, 2025.

The plaintiff’s lawyer asked for a two-week extension, explaining that the parties had exchanged drafts and were finalizing the settlement language, signatures, and court submission. The request was made with all parties’ consent.

The court granted the extension, moving the deadline to October 1, 2025. Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. entered the order on September 16, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Garcia v. Vista on 5th · No. 1:25-cv-00494
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Sept. 16, 2025

Background

The court had previously directed the parties to file their proposed settlement and a joint memorandum of law by September 17, 2025. The filing was to comply with the court’s review requirements for the settlement.

Request

The plaintiff’s lawyer requested a two-week extension, to October 1, 2025. The letter said the parties had exchanged drafts and proposed changes and were finalizing the settlement agreement, obtaining signatures, and preparing the materials for the court’s review. It also stated that this was the first request for an extension and that all parties consented.

Ruling

The court granted the requested extension and set October 1, 2025, as the new deadline for filing the settlement materials. Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. entered the order on September 16, 2025.

Effect

The order addressed only the timing of the settlement filing. The opinion text does not decide the underlying claims or state whether the court approved the settlement itself.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.