Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 18, 2025

Global Media Network; William Scales v. Apple Music

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-06154
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Global Media Network v. Apple Music: Judge Swain dismissed the action without prejudice because William Scales violated a prior filing restriction.

Who this affects

William Scales and Global Media Network; the action against Apple Music was dismissed without prejudice, and Scales remained subject to the prior restriction on filing future civil actions without paying fees or obtaining court permission.

What happened

In Global Media Network; William Scales v. Apple Music, William Scales filed a new case for himself and Global Media Network without a lawyer. The case was filed in the Southern District of New York.

A prior court order barred Scales from filing future civil actions without paying filing fees unless he first obtained the court’s permission. Because Scales had not paid the fees or requested permission, the court treated the case as one seeking to proceed without paying filing fees. The court also noted that Global Media Network could not proceed without a lawyer or seek that status.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the action without prejudice for violating the earlier order. She also denied permission to proceed without paying fees on appeal, directed the Clerk to enter judgment, and stated that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Global Media Network; William Scales v. Apple Music · No. 1:25-cv-06154
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 18, 2025

Background

William Scales filed this action pro se, meaning without a lawyer, in his own name and in the name of his company, Global Media Network (GMN). The opinion states that an earlier order barred Scales from filing future civil actions without paying filing fees in this court, either in his own name or in his companies’ names, unless he first obtained permission from the court. That restriction took effect on July 23, 2025.

Scales did not pay the filing fees or ask for permission to file this action. Because the fees were unpaid, the court assumed for purposes of this order that he was seeking to proceed without paying filing fees. The court also noted that GMN could not proceed without a lawyer or seek that status because it is an artificial entity. The opinion states that the court had previously warned Scales about filing cases for artificial entities without counsel.

Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the action without prejudice because Scales failed to comply with the earlier filing-restriction order. The order therefore did not decide the underlying dispute with Apple Music. The court directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying filing fees for purposes of an appeal.

Classification

This is a procedural order. The court dismissed the action for failure to comply with a filing restriction and did not reach the merits of the claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.