Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 18, 2025

Mike Sheriff Scott v. The City of New York; et al.

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-07692
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Mike Sheriff Scott v. The City of New York, Chief Judge Swain ordered payment or an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Mike Sheriff Scott must either pay the required fees or submit the required application and prisoner authorization within 30 days; the underlying defendants were not required to answer at this stage.

What happened

Mike Sheriff Scott sued The City of New York and other defendants while incarcerated and without a lawyer. He submitted his complaint without paying the required fees or completing the required forms.

The court gave Scott 30 days to either pay $405 or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. The authorization would allow installment payments of the $350 filing fee from his prison account. The court said the action will be dismissed if he does not comply, and no answer is required yet.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the claims against the defendants.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mike Sheriff Scott v. The City of New York; et al. · No. 1:25-cv-07692
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 18, 2025

Background

Mike Sheriff Scott, who was incarcerated at the Northeast Ohio Correctional Center, brought this action without a lawyer. He filed the complaint without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Court’s order

The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $405 in fees—$350 for the filing fee and $55 for the administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepaying fees. If that request is granted, the $350 filing fee must still be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The prisoner authorization directs the correctional facility to make those deductions and provide certified account statements for the prior six months.

The court ordered Scott, within 30 days of the order’s date, to either pay the $405 or submit the attached application and prisoner authorization. The documents were to identify docket number 1:25-CV-7692 (LTS). The court stated that no answer was required at that time and that, if Scott complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. The court further stated that the action will be dismissed if he failed to comply within the permitted time.

Appeal and effect

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. This order addressed filing-fee requirements and did not rule on the merits of Scott’s claims against The City of New York or the other defendants. The order also cautioned about the possible consequences under federal law if a prisoner’s action is later dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failing to state a claim.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.