Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 22, 2025

Urttech LLC v. Gojo Industries, Inc.

Judge
P. Castel
Docket
1:22-cv-06727
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Urttech LLC v. Gojo Industries, Judge Parker granted Dr. Awad’s motion to seal a deposition exhibit containing sensitive business information.

Who this affects

Third-party Dr. Aziz C. Awad, Gojo Industries, Inc., and access to the deposition exhibit filed at ECF No. 170.

What happened

In Urttech LLC v. Gojo Industries, third-party Dr. Aziz C. Awad asked the court to seal a deposition exhibit titled “04-24-25 Awad Dep. Ex. 25.” Gojo said the exhibit contained sensitive business information, including internal market analysis, product analysis, strategy, and developmental planning.

The court found that sealing the document was narrowly tailored to protect that sensitive business information and consistent with the legal standard for sealing court records. The court also noted Dr. Awad’s argument that the exhibit was not central to public issues in the case.

Judge Katharine H. Parker granted Dr. Awad’s motion to seal. The Clerk was directed to terminate the motion and keep the exhibit filed at ECF No. 170 under seal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Urttech LLC v. Gojo Industries, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-06727
Judge
P. Castel
Date
Sept. 22, 2025

Background

Third-party Dr. Aziz C. Awad filed a letter motion asking to submit a deposition exhibit, “04-24-25 Awad Dep. Ex. 25,” under seal. Dr. Awad relied on Gojo Industries, Inc.’s statement that the document contained highly sensitive business information concerning its internal market analysis, product analysis, strategy, and developmental planning. Dr. Awad also argued that the exhibit was not central to public issues in the case.

Court’s analysis

The court reviewed the proposed sealed document and found that sealing it was narrowly tailored to protect sensitive business information. The court held that the request was consistent with the standard from Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, which permits sealing when specific findings show that closure is essential to protect higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest.

Ruling

The court granted Dr. Awad’s Letter Motion to Seal. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 169 and keep the document filed at ECF No. 170 under seal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.