Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 22, 2025

Stringer v. St. Martin’s Press

Judge
Garnett
Docket
1:25-cv-06651
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Stringer v. St. Martin’s Press, Judge Garnett ordered the Marshals Service to serve the complaint on St. Martin’s Press.

Who this affects

Vickie M. Stringer and St. Martin’s Press, LLC; the order primarily directs court personnel and the United States Marshals Service to serve the complaint on St. Martin’s Press.

What happened

In Vickie M. Stringer v. St. Martin’s Press, LLC, Vickie M. Stringer, representing herself, brought state-law claims under the court’s diversity jurisdiction. She seeks at least $350,000 for allegedly unpaid agent commissions, interest, and other relief.

The court had allowed Stringer to proceed without paying filing fees and ordered the Clerk of Court to issue a summons and prepare the documents needed for the United States Marshals Service to serve St. Martin’s Press. Service must occur within 90 days after the summons is issued; if it does not, Stringer should ask for more time. The order did not decide whether her claims are legally valid.

Judge Margaret M. Garnett also directed the court to send Stringer an information package and reminded her to notify the court if her address changes. The order states that the case may be dismissed if she fails to provide an updated address.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Stringer v. St. Martin’s Press · No. 1:25-cv-06651
Judge
Garnett
Date
Sept. 22, 2025

Background

Vickie M. Stringer, who is proceeding without a lawyer, asserts state-law claims against St. Martin’s Press, LLC under the court’s diversity subject-matter jurisdiction. She alleges that St. Martin’s Press has its principal place of business in New York, New York. Stringer seeks at least $350,000 in compensatory damages for allegedly unpaid agent commissions, prejudgment and postjudgment interest, an accounting of revenue from brokered works, direct payment of future agent commissions, and an order concerning allegedly false or misleading royalty statements.

The court previously granted Stringer permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees. The opinion also notes that Stringer’s claims against Macmillan Publishers, LLC, another defendant named in the complaint, were dismissed without prejudice at Stringer’s request in an earlier order. This order concerns service on St. Martin’s Press.

Ruling

The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons for St. Martin’s Press, complete a United States Marshals Service receipt-and-return form with the defendant’s service address, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve the summons and complaint. Because Stringer is proceeding without prepaying fees, the court stated that the Marshals Service will assist with service.

The complaint must be served within 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, Stringer should request an extension of time. The court also directed that an information package be mailed to Stringer and stated that she must notify the court in writing if her address changes. The order does not resolve the merits of Stringer’s claims or St. Martin’s Press’s potential defenses.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.