Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 22, 2025

Mallgren v. United States

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-07349
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Judge Swain dismissed Mallgren v. United States without prejudice because Mallgren filed without required permission after an earlier filing restriction.

Who this affects

Anthony Brian Mallgren's case was dismissed without prejudice; the order also denied him permission to appeal without paying the filing fee.

What happened

In Anthony Brian Mallgren v. United States; New York State, Mallgren filed a new civil case without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying the filing fee. An earlier court order required him to get permission before filing future cases without paying that fee.

Mallgren had not requested that permission before filing this case. The court therefore dismissed the action without prejudice for violating the earlier order.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the clerk to enter judgment and denied Mallgren permission to appeal without paying the fee, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mallgren v. United States · No. 1:25-cv-07349
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 22, 2025

Background

In an order dated May 4, 2016, the court barred Anthony Brian Mallgren from filing any future civil action in the Southern District of New York without paying the filing fee unless he first obtained the court's permission. In this case, Mallgren filed a new civil action without a lawyer and sought to proceed without paying the filing fee. He did not first seek the required permission.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 because Mallgren failed to comply with the May 4, 2016 order. The opinion does not address the underlying claims against the United States or New York State.

Additional Order

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Mallgren permission to appeal without paying the filing fee. It directed the clerk to enter a judgment dismissing the action and to mail the order and judgment to Mallgren at his address of record and at the additional address listed in the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.