Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 23, 2025

Francisco Delgado Escamilla, et al. v. 48 West 21st Street Corp., et al.

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:25-cv-00784
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Francisco Delgado Escamilla v. 48 West 21st Street Corp., Judge Broderick ordered entry of a $300,000 Fair Labor Standards Act judgment despite fee-detail concerns.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in the Fair Labor Standards Act case were affected: the court ordered entry of the Rule 68 judgment for $300,000, inclusive of attorneys’ fees and costs, without specifying the allocation between the judgment amount and those fees or costs.

What happened

Francisco Delgado Escamilla v. 48 West 21st Street Corp. is a Fair Labor Standards Act case in which the parties asked the court to enter a judgment based on their offer and acceptance under a federal settlement rule.

The offer set the judgment amount at $300,000, including attorneys’ fees and costs, but did not say how much would go to fees or costs. The court said it could not evaluate whether the fees were reasonable or compare the amount with the plaintiffs’ possible maximum recovery.

Judge Broderick nevertheless ordered the clerk to enter the judgment because a Second Circuit decision required that result for this type of offer. The judgment was to be filed at the same time as the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Francisco Delgado Escamilla, et al. v. 48 West 21st Street Corp., et al. · No. 1:25-cv-00784
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Sept. 23, 2025

Background

The parties sought entry of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 based on the plaintiffs’ acceptance of the defendants’ offer of judgment in this Fair Labor Standards Act case. Rule 68 permits a party to make an offer to have judgment entered on specified terms.

The court explained that, under the Second Circuit’s decision in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., parties generally cannot privately resolve Fair Labor Standards Act claims without court approval or approval from the Department of Labor. The court also explained that the Second Circuit later held in Mei Xing Yu v. Hasaki Restaurant, Inc. that judicial approval is not required for a Rule 68 offer of judgment resolving Fair Labor Standards Act claims.

Court’s Analysis

The offer set the judgment amount at $300,000, inclusive of attorneys’ fees and costs, but did not identify the amount allocated to fees or costs. The court stated that this made it impossible to determine whether the attorneys’ fees were reasonable. The court also stated that it could not compare the judgment amount with the plaintiffs’ maximum possible recovery.

The court said these terms were ones it would likely consider unreasonable if the agreement had been submitted for review under Cheeks. It nevertheless concluded that Mei Xing Yu required the court to enter the proposed judgment, even though the court believed the result would likely differ under the Cheeks review process.

Disposition

The court ordered that judgment be entered according to the parties’ Rule 68 offer and acceptance of judgment. The judgment was to be filed simultaneously with the order. The opinion does not state how much of the $300,000 would be paid as attorneys’ fees or costs.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.