Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 23, 2025

GS Holistic v. NYC Smoke Shop & Grocery Corp. d/b/a International Smoke Shop…

Full caption

GS Holistic, LLC v. NYC Smoke Shop & Grocery Corp. d/b/a International Smoke Shop and Abdo M. Saleh

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:25-cv-03899
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In GS Holistic v. NYC Smoke Shop, Judge Engelmayer gave the corporation and Saleh deadlines to comply with representation rules.

Who this affects

NYC Smoke Shop must obtain a lawyer to continue defending the case, and Abdo M. Saleh must either obtain a lawyer or appear on his own behalf by October 14, 2025. GS Holistic’s deadline to seek default judgment was extended to October 28, 2025.

What happened

GS Holistic, LLC sued NYC Smoke Shop & Grocery Corp. and Abdo M. Saleh for trademark infringement. The defendants did not properly respond by their deadlines, and the plaintiff obtained certificates showing that they were in default.

Christopher Burrus, a non-party, tried to answer for the defendants and filed a notice saying he was appearing without a lawyer. The court ruled that a non-lawyer cannot represent a corporation or another person in court.

Judge Engelmayer gave NYC Smoke Shop until October 14, 2025, to retain a lawyer and gave Saleh until that date either to retain a lawyer or appear on his own behalf. The court extended the plaintiff’s deadline to seek default judgment to October 28, 2025, but did not enter default judgment in this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
GS Holistic v. NYC Smoke Shop & Grocery Corp. d/b/a International Smoke Shop… · No. 1:25-cv-03899
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Sept. 23, 2025

Background

GS Holistic, LLC filed a complaint alleging that NYC Smoke Shop & Grocery Corp., doing business as International Smoke Shop, and Abdo M. Saleh infringed its trademark. The plaintiff filed certificates stating that the summons and complaint had been served on the corporate defendant and Saleh. Their deadlines to answer or otherwise respond were June 9 and June 13, 2025.

Christopher Burrus, who was not a party, filed a power of attorney stating that he had been appointed Saleh’s agent. He also filed an answer and a notice of appearance without a lawyer. The court had previously noted that the defendants, rather than Burrus, had not answered or otherwise responded. The plaintiff then obtained a Clerk’s Certificate of Default for each defendant. A certificate of default is a clerk’s formal entry that a party failed to respond as required.

Court’s Ruling

The court ruled that Burrus’s attempt to represent the defendants was improper. A non-lawyer may not represent a separate legal entity such as a corporation, so NYC Smoke Shop may continue defending the case only through a lawyer. Burrus also may not represent Saleh because Burrus is not a lawyer.

The court gave NYC Smoke Shop until October 14, 2025, to retain an attorney and have that attorney formally appear. If the corporation remained unrepresented after that date, the court stated that it would be compelled to entertain the plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for default judgment against it. Saleh was given until October 14 either to retain a lawyer or to file a notice appearing on his own behalf.

The court extended the plaintiff’s deadline to file a motion for default judgment until October 28, 2025. It also directed the plaintiff to promptly serve the order on the defendants and then file a sworn declaration or affidavit identifying the dates and methods of service. The order did not itself enter default judgment or decide the trademark-infringement claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.