Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 5, 2025

Cardenas v. California Forensic Medical Group

Judge
Donna Ryu
Docket
4:24-cv-04248
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
15
Civil RightsSection 1983Motion to DismissCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Florinda Izazaga Cardenas v. California Forensic Medical Group, Judge Ryu granted dismissal, allowing amendment of the federal claim but ending the negligence claim.

Who this affects

Florinda Izazaga Cardenas’s claims against California Forensic Medical Group, Inc. were affected: the § 1983 claim may be amended, while the negligence claim was dismissed without leave to amend.

What happened

Florinda Izazaga Cardenas v. California Forensic Medical Group, Inc. concerns claims arising from Daniel Rivera Izazaga’s death after he died by suicide while detained in the Napa County Jail. Cardenas alleged that jail and medical personnel failed to respond properly to his repeated statements that he was suicidal. Her amended complaint asserted a federal civil-rights claim and a negligence claim against unidentified defendants, the trustee of the Wellpath Liquidating Trust, and California Forensic Medical Group, Inc. (CFMG).\n\nCFMG asked the court to dismiss both claims. The court ruled that the negligence claim was governed by California’s one-year deadline for professional negligence claims against health-care providers, rather than the general two-year deadline. Because Cardenas named CFMG after that deadline and waived her argument that the claim should relate back to an earlier complaint, the negligence claim was time-barred. The court also found that the federal claim did not clearly identify what CFMG employees did or whether they knew about Izazaga’s suicidal statements.\n\nThe court dismissed the federal civil-rights claim with leave to amend and dismissed the negligence claim without leave to amend. Any amended complaint was due December 19, 2025. Judge Donna M. Ryu issued the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cardenas v. California Forensic Medical Group · No. 4:24-cv-04248
Judge
Donna Ryu
Date
Dec. 5, 2025

The authoritative version

Read the full 15-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.