Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 25, 2025

Lewis v. Dr. Robert Bentivegna

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
7:25-cv-03632
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

Michael Lewis v. Bentivegna: Judge Seibel ordered service on two defendants and required identification of another nurse.

Who this affects

Michael Lewis, Dr. Robert Bentivegna, RN Krystal Lewis-Heady, “Nurse Alexandra,” the Clerk of Court, the U.S. Marshals Service, and the New York Attorney General’s Office.

What happened

In Michael Lewis v. Dr. Robert Bentivegna, et al., Michael Lewis, who is representing himself, brought constitutional-rights claims under a federal civil-rights law against medical and prison officials. The court had allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees upfront, and service on Dr. Bentivegna and “Nurse Alexandra” had not been completed.

The Attorney General identified RN Krystal Lewis-Heady as a nurse who treated Lewis and provided service addresses for her and Dr. Bentivegna. The court also ordered the Attorney General to identify “Nurse Alexandra” and provide a service address within 60 days.

Judge Cathy Seibel ordered the Clerk of Court to issue a summons for Krystal Lewis-Heady, prepare service forms for her and Dr. Bentivegna, and send the required documents to the U.S. Marshals Service for service. The order did not decide whether Lewis’s constitutional claims have merit.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lewis v. Dr. Robert Bentivegna · No. 7:25-cv-03632
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 25, 2025

Background

Michael Lewis, who is incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility and is representing himself, filed claims seeking damages and other relief for alleged violations of his federal constitutional rights. The court treated the complaint as asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a law that allows claims against state officials for violating federal rights.

The court had granted Lewis permission to proceed without paying filing fees upfront. Because he was proceeding this way, the court explained that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

The court had previously directed service on the identified defendants and required the New York Attorney General’s Office to identify “Nurse H.” Service on Dr. Robert Bentivegna was returned unexecuted because he no longer worked at Green Haven. Service on “Nurse Alexandra” was also returned unexecuted. The Attorney General reported that RN Krystal Lewis-Heady was the only nurse who treated Lewis whose last name began with H and provided service addresses for Lewis-Heady and Dr. Bentivegna.

Court’s analysis and orders

The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete service forms for Krystal Lewis-Heady and Dr. Bentivegna, issue a summons for Lewis-Heady, and provide the necessary paperwork to the U.S. Marshals Service so it could serve both defendants. The court stated that if service was not completed within 90 days after the summonses were issued, Lewis should request an extension of time.

The court also ordered the Attorney General, acting for the state corrections department, to determine “Nurse Alexandra’s” identity and service address within 60 days. The opinion noted that it was unclear whether “Alexandra” was the nurse’s first or last name and that the name might instead be “Alejandro.” After receiving the information, the court stated that it would issue an order directing service.

Disposition and significance

The order addressed service and identification of defendants. It did not resolve the merits of Lewis’s constitutional claims or state that any defendant was liable. Judge Cathy Seibel also directed the Clerk to mail a copy of the order to Assistant Attorney General Daniel S. Kirschbaum.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.