FIDENCIO CANO ARMENTA v. SINGAPORE GRILL NY INC., et al.
- James Oetken
- 1:24-cv-01261
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Fidencio Cano Armenta v. Singapore Grill NY, Judge Wang ordered the settled parties to confer and report on Cheeks submissions by October 10, 2025.
The parties to the settled case, including Fidencio Cano Armenta and Singapore Grill NY Inc., et al.
What happened
In Fidencio Cano Armenta v. Singapore Grill NY Inc., et al., the parties had reached a settlement agreement.
The court directed the parties to meet and discuss how to proceed, then file a joint letter by October 10, 2025. The letter must either say that they intend to follow the procedure described in a cited Second Circuit case or propose a schedule for their Cheeks submissions.
Judge Ona T. Wang entered this order. The order did not decide the underlying claims or state whether the settlement would be approved.
The detailed version
- FIDENCIO CANO ARMENTA v. SINGAPORE GRILL NY INC., et al. · No. 1:24-cv-01261
- James Oetken
- Sept. 26, 2025
Background
The opinion states that the parties reached a settlement agreement. It does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Order
The court directed the parties to meet and confer, meaning to discuss the next procedural steps. By October 10, 2025, they must file a joint letter on the docket. The letter must either inform the court that they intend to follow the example described in Mei Xing Yu v. Hasaki Rest., Inc., 944 F.3d 395, 398 (2d Cir. 2019), or propose a briefing schedule for their Cheeks submissions. Cheeks submissions are materials submitted for court review of certain settlements.
Disposition
The court entered this procedural order concerning the settled case. It did not resolve the underlying claims or state whether the settlement would be approved.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.