Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 29, 2025

Frost v. Aldi Inc.

Full caption

Maggie Frost, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Aldi Inc.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:24-cv-07095
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Frost v. Aldi, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the settled class action without costs, allowing restoration by October 29, 2025, otherwise with prejudice.

Who this affects

Maggie Frost, Aldi Inc., and the other people identified in the caption as similarly situated were affected by the conditional discontinuance and dismissal.

What happened

In Maggie Frost, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Aldi Inc., the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the case without costs to either party. The case could be restored to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and requested restoration by October 29, 2025.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. She also postponed all other dates and deadlines indefinitely.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Frost v. Aldi Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-07095
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Sept. 29, 2025

Background

The parties informed the court by letter that they had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar. Restoration was available if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and made the restoration application by October 29, 2025. If no application was made by that date, the court stated that the dismissal would be with prejudice. The court also adjourned all other dates and deadlines indefinitely.

Effect

This order resolved the case based on the parties’ reported settlement process; it did not decide the underlying claims. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order on September 29, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.