Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 29, 2025

Gittens v. Department of Homeland Security

Judge
George Daniels
Docket
1:25-cv-07959
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil ProcedureImmigrationPro Se
In one sentence

In Ryan Gittens v. Department of Homeland Security, Judge Daniels transferred Gittens’s detention challenge to Louisiana because the relevant district was there.

Who this affects

Ryan Gittens’s § 2241 detention petition was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Western District of Louisiana. The transferee court will decide whether he may proceed without paying filing fees.

What happened

Ryan Gittens filed a self-represented petition challenging his immigration detention under a federal law that allows courts to review detention. He was detained at Winn Correctional Center in Louisiana, while this case was filed in the Southern District of New York.

The court explained that a detention challenge generally belongs in the district where the person is confined because that court must have authority over the person responsible for the detention. Because Gittens was detained in Louisiana, the court transferred the petition to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana and closed this case.

Judge George B. Daniels ordered the immediate transfer. The Louisiana court will decide whether Gittens may proceed without paying filing fees. Judge Daniels also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gittens v. Department of Homeland Security · No. 1:25-cv-07959
Judge
George Daniels
Date
Sept. 29, 2025

Background

Ryan Gittens, who was representing himself, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his immigration detention. The opinion states that he was detained at Winn Correctional Center in Winnfield, Winn Parish, Louisiana. The respondent was the Department of Homeland Security.

Reason for Transfer

The court explained that a court hearing a detention petition under § 2241 must have jurisdiction—legal authority—over the person responsible for the detention. Citing Supreme Court decisions, the court stated that a petition challenging physical confinement generally belongs in the federal district where the petitioner is confined. Winn Correctional Center is in the Western District of Louisiana.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), the court therefore transferred the petition to the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana in the interest of justice. The opinion did not decide whether Gittens’s detention was lawful or otherwise reach the merits of his challenge.

Disposition

The court directed the Clerk to transfer the action immediately and waived the seven-day waiting period under the local rule. The order closed the case in the Southern District of New York. It stated that the transferee court would decide whether Gittens could proceed without paying fees.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The order was issued by Judge George B. Daniels.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.