Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 29, 2025

Torgerson v. Law & Crime Productions

Full caption

Kristopher Paul Torgerson v. Law & Crime Productions, LLC; Jellysmack, Inc.; Google LLC d/b/a YouTube

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-07749
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Torgerson v. Law & Crime, Judge Swain transferred the lawsuit to Wisconsin because the alleged events occurred there.

Who this affects

Kristopher Paul Torgerson’s lawsuit is moved from the Southern District of New York to the Western District of Wisconsin. The three defendants remain parties, but the Wisconsin court will handle further proceedings and the pending service-related and fee questions.

What happened

Kristopher Paul Torgerson v. Law & Crime Productions, LLC involves Torgerson’s claims under federal civil-rights law and state law against three defendants. He alleges that the defendants improperly livestreamed, edited, published, and made money from his Wisconsin criminal trial. He is incarcerated and represents himself.

The court found that the Southern District of New York might be a proper venue, but that the Western District of Wisconsin was also proper because a substantial part of the alleged events occurred in Marathon County, Wisconsin. The court decided that Wisconsin appeared more convenient because relevant witnesses and documents were likely to be there.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the case transferred to the Western District of Wisconsin. The New York court did not decide the merits of Torgerson’s claims. It left decisions about proceeding without paying filing fees and the pending service-related motion to the Wisconsin court, and denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Torgerson v. Law & Crime Productions · No. 1:25-cv-07749
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 29, 2025

Background

Kristopher Paul Torgerson, who is incarcerated at Waupun Correctional Institution in Wisconsin, filed this self-represented lawsuit against Law & Crime Productions, LLC; Jellysmack, Inc.; and Google LLC, doing business as YouTube. He asserts claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law, and seeks damages, court orders requiring or prohibiting conduct, and declarations of his rights.

Torgerson alleges that the defendants conducted unauthorized, commercial livestreaming of his Wisconsin criminal trial and published, edited, monetized, and syndicated material from the trial without court authorization or his consent. The trial occurred in Marathon County, Wisconsin, which is in the Western District of Wisconsin. Torgerson also alleges that Google has operations and commercial infrastructure in New York and profits from viewership there.

Venue and Transfer

Venue is the federal district where a lawsuit may properly be heard. The court considered the federal venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). It found that the Southern District of New York might be a proper venue based on the allegations concerning the defendants’ activities and connections there. It also found that the Western District of Wisconsin was a proper venue because a substantial part of the alleged events occurred in Marathon County.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), a federal court may transfer a case to another proper federal district for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. The court concluded that transfer appeared appropriate because the alleged events occurred in Wisconsin and relevant documents and witnesses were reasonably expected to be located there. It therefore transferred the action to the Western District of Wisconsin.

Rulings and Effect

The court directed the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the Western District of Wisconsin. The New York court did not decide whether Torgerson’s claims were legally valid. It stated that the transferee court would decide whether he could continue without prepaying fees and whether his pending motion concerning summonses and service should be granted. Summonses would not issue from the Southern District of New York, and the court terminated that pending motion there.

The order closed the action in the Southern District of New York. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.