Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 29, 2025

Kilinic v. PMMUE Eduservices Private Limited

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:25-cv-07931
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ege Kilinic v. PMMUE Eduservices Private Limited, Judge Gorenstein granted cost-free filing status and set different service arrangements for defendants.

Who this affects

The plaintiff, Ege Kilinic, received permission to proceed without prepaying filing costs. The Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service were directed to take steps to serve PMMUE Eduservices Private Limited and Viney Sawhney; the plaintiff must arrange service on UBI Business School himself.

What happened

In Ege Kilinic v. PMMUE Eduservices Private Limited et al., the plaintiff paid the filing fee but also applied to proceed without prepaying filing costs. The court granted that application.

Because the plaintiff was granted that status, the U.S. Marshals Service may serve defendants located in the United States if requested. The plaintiff must arrange service on UBI Business School himself, while the Clerk must prepare summonses and service documents for the Marshals Service to serve PMMUE Eduservices Private Limited and Viney Sawhney.

The order concerns filing status and service of the lawsuit, not the underlying claims. Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein issued the order on September 29, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kilinic v. PMMUE Eduservices Private Limited · No. 1:25-cv-07931
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Sept. 29, 2025

Background

Ege Kilinic paid the filing fee in the case and also submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning to proceed without prepaying filing costs. The court granted that application based on the representations in the application.

Service of Process

Because the plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, he may ask the U.S. Marshals Service to serve a summons and complaint on defendants located in the United States. The order states that the Marshals Service is not authorized to serve documents outside the United States. The plaintiff therefore must arrange service on UBI Business School himself.

For PMMUE Eduservices Private Limited and Viney Sawhney, the Clerk of Court was instructed to issue summonses, complete the required U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return forms using the addresses stated in the complaint, and provide the necessary documents to the Marshals Service.

Disposition

The court granted the application to proceed in forma pauperis and entered the service instructions described above. The order did not decide the underlying claims against the defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.