Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 1, 2025

Feuer v. Lauren M. McFerran

Judge
Willis
Docket
1:22-cv-10433
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Elias Feuer v. Lauren M. McFerran, Judge Willis granted the sealing motion, struck three filings, and allowed redacted refiling.

Who this affects

The Government and Elias Feuer are affected by the filing changes; the sealed materials concern third parties, including sitting administrative law judges whose personal and professional information appears in the exhibits.

What happened

In Elias Feuer v. Lauren M. McFerran, the Government asked to seal six exhibits connected to its summary-judgment motion. The Government said the exhibits contained sensitive information about third parties, including sitting administrative law judges, and that public disclosure could cause embarrassment or harm future job applications. Feuer was representing himself and had previously agreed to the sealing request.

The Government also asked the court to remove three filings from the docket because they contained information that was redacted in the sealed exhibits. It asked for permission to file replacement versions with limited, matching redactions.

Judge Jennifer E. Willis granted the motion to seal, struck docket numbers 49-1, 62, and 75, and granted the Government permission to refile those documents to conform to its sealing request.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Feuer v. Lauren M. McFerran · No. 1:22-cv-10433
Judge
Willis
Date
Oct. 1, 2025

Background

This order concerns the Government’s request to seal materials filed in an employment-discrimination action brought by Elias Feuer, who was representing himself. The Government had previously sought permission to file six exhibits under seal in connection with its motion for summary judgment. The court had denied that earlier sealing motion without prejudice and directed the Government to submit a conforming request after addressing related filings.

Requests

The Government renewed its request to seal Exhibits G, H, I, J, K, and X to the declaration of Rebecca Salk. It stated that the exhibits contained sensitive information about third parties, including observations from sitting administrative law judges concerning resumes, writing samples, work history, and personal character. The Government argued that public disclosure could disadvantage those individuals in future job applications or cause public embarrassment. The filing states that Feuer previously consented to the sealing request.

The Government also asked the court to strike three filings—Docket Nos. 49-1, 62, and 75—because they contained information that was redacted in the sealed exhibits. It requested permission to refile those documents with limited redactions consistent with the sealing request. The court noted that Docket No. 61 also contained information redacted in the sealed exhibits, but stated that the Government had not identified information in that document requiring redaction.

Ruling

Judge Jennifer E. Willis granted the Government’s motion to seal. The court struck Docket Nos. 49-1, 62, and 75 from the docket and granted the Government leave to refile those three documents to conform with its sealing request. The order did not state a ruling on the underlying employment-discrimination claims or the parties’ summary-judgment motions.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.