Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 6, 2025

Carrasquillo v. State of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-08144
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Shakur Carrasquillo v. State of New York, Chief Judge Swain ordered payment or prisoner authorization within 30 days.

Who this affects

Shakur Carrasquillo and the processing of his civil action as a prisoner case; the opinion states that he is incarcerated at Wende Correctional Facility and represented himself.

What happened

Shakur Carrasquillo v. State of New York concerns the filing requirements for a prisoner who wants to bring a civil case without paying court fees in advance. Carrasquillo submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees but did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

The court ordered Carrasquillo, within 30 days, either to pay $405 in fees or submit the completed authorization. The authorization would allow installment deductions for the $350 filing fee and require certified account statements. No summons would issue yet, and the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not address the merits of Carrasquillo’s claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Carrasquillo v. State of New York · No. 1:25-cv-08144
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 6, 2025

Background

Shakur Carrasquillo, who the opinion states is incarcerated at Wende Correctional Facility, brought this civil action without a lawyer. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees, commonly called an application to proceed in forma pauperis, but did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

Filing requirements

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or submit the required documents to request permission to proceed without prepayment. If permission is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the $350 filing fee to be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The prisoner authorization directs the correctional facility to make those deductions and provide certified copies of the prisoner’s account statements for the prior six months. The $55 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepayment.

Order

The court ordered Carrasquillo, within 30 days of the October 6, 2025 order, either to pay the $405 in fees or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 25-CV-8144 (LTS). No summons would issue at that time. If he complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the merits of Carrasquillo’s claims. It also warned about the possible consequences under the prisoner “three strikes” rule for a later action dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.